the Los Angeles Times reported on Feb. 3. “Two Palestinian militant groups threatened to retaliate against the newspapers by kidnapping European citizens and targeting churches and European offices.”
To these Looney Tunes, these cartoons are as offensive as seeing a woman’s ankle.
No, no, knee.
They are as offensive as seeing a woman’s knee.
That’s serious.
Certainly one can be annoyed and register a complaint, like the president of Afghanistan did. True these are just cartoons, but whatever. Others were upset in 2002 when President Bush opened the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics by adding the words “on behalf of a proud, determined and grateful nation” when he declared the Games underway, breaking with tradition. The things we choose to care about can be strange indeed.
But there is a world of difference between giving a disapproving quote to an AP stringer and using physical violence to intercede against the free expression of ideas. To their eternal and surprising credit, numerous European news organizations published the cartoons as a big “Fuck you” to the pinheads rioting, which only exacerbated the situation.
“A real totalitarianism is at work in the world and wants to impose its views not only on Arab Muslims, but on the West. The same way that they veil women, Islamic radicals want to veil cartoons in the press," a Swiss cartoonist told the Times.
A revelation. I wonder how many times he (or more certainly his friends) sniggered when hearing President Bush or Don Rumsfeld remark along the same lines approximately 409,789 times since September 2001.
But, if after thousands of grisly deaths and countless threats over the last two decades, this cartoon kerfluffle is what shocks the Europeans out of their defensive crouches and into action, then great. Somebody should alter American Gothic and replace the male farmer with an image of Mohammed holding a Coke.
Maybe the resulting furor will shock the French into landing a division or two near Basra.
And the United States response? "Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable. We call for tolerance and respect for all communities and for their religious beliefs and practices," said State Department spokesman Justin Higgins. “We all fully recognize and respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility.”
This would be a disappointing statement of weak-kneed appeasement, except nobody seriously considers Foggy Bottom an actual part of the government. They are the Sunni Triangle of the Bush Administration.
But sure, we all want press responsibility, but not in deference to Stone Age values antithetical to modernity.
“This is just a clear case of where people would find those offensive so we don’t see any particular reason to do it just for shock value,” said the foreign editor of the Washington Post when asked if his newspaper would publish the cartoons.
No, of course not. But heaven forefend publishing the images to send a message that defends the right of public dialogue unfettered by the ululated threats of decapitation for engaging in public dialogue.
The New York Times had no comment for the reporter. It’s nice to see them so concerned with press freedoms. They can endanger the national security of the United States by publishing our efforts to spy on America’s enemies, but they can’t be bothered to defend their right to publish material that reveals why America’s enemies are worth spying on in the first place.
On Jan. 29, the Washington Post published a cartoon by University at Buffalo alum and former Buffalo News cartoonist Tom Toles. The cartoon jabs at a remark by Rumsfeld using the visual image of a wounded soldier – a quadruple amputee. Toles’ cutesy style makes the image no less jarring and borderline tasteless.
The cartoon in question. It makes me sad he got his start at The Spectrum at UB.
This upset many at the Pentagon, especially the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In a rare move, all five chiefs co-authored a letter to the Post protesting the cartoon.
“While The Post and some of its readers may not agree with the war or its conduct, these men and women and their families are owed the decency of not having a cartoon make light of their tremendous physical sacrifices,” the chiefs wrote.
The letter contained respect and brevity. Notice what it did not contain – egg-throwing, rock hurling and newspaper burning.
In short, it was civilized.
The men and women under the Joint Chiefs’ command rouse themselves on a daily basis to defend what makes us civilized.
Would some of those beneficiaries of their service do the same?
Questions? Comments? Blasphemer? E-mail me at mlucinski@yahoo.com
Michael Lucinski lives, loves and works in the Washington, D.C. area. He’s a graduate of the University at Buffalo and the George Washington University. This is giving me a headache.